NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
NNSquad Home Page
NNSquad Mailing List Information
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ NNSquad ] Re: Subject: Re: [IP] "Entry level pricing"
- To: George Ou <george_ou@lanarchitect.net>
- Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: Subject: Re: [IP] "Entry level pricing"
- From: Russell Smiley <im.russell.smiley@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2009 17:20:37 -0400
- Cc: nnsquad@nnsquad.org
George Ou wrote:
If you're getting 1/5th the speed, then it sounds like your particular line
quality is so poor that your sync rate is only 768 Kbps. However, your case
is the exception and not the rule.
It's actually wireless DSL (wimax) so there are no sync rate problems to
speak of except the throttling performed by the ISP to limit subscriber
rates. Signal strength is not a factor since I am close enough to the
basestation to get full strength (and in any case wimax is not
particularly susceptible to signal strength problems affecting data rates).
My suspicion is that the ISP has completely oversubscribed the backhaul
network to my basestation - this is confirmed by the fact that the
actual wireless network is managed by a joint venture between my ISP and
another and the other ISP advertises 2Mbps (for the same cost).
Consumers should always verify their own speeds at places like speedtest.net
and if they don't get 80+ percent of the advertised sync rate on
speedtest.net or some nearby test server (due to a lower sync rate), they
should demand their money back. Some DSL modems are also better than
others, and sometimes you may have to power down the modem for 5 minutes and
power back on to get the DSLAM to reset its sync rates on your port.
It is well known that ISPs optimise for speed test results on popular
websites. My speed test results have always indicated full speed which
is completely contradictory to my experience with any activity other
than running a speed test. I observed optimisation of this kind directly
with my ISP in relation to virus update downloads from well known
websites such as mcafee and norton (slightly different issue but it
illustrates directly that ISPs do optimise for specific sites).
Now I do think ISPs bear a lot of the blame for the lack of a transparency
standard, and they also need standards for delivered versus advertised. It
would seem to me that ISPs should proactively monitor sync rates for
customers and either fix the cable quality or drop the customer's speed plan
and give them the lower rate instead of expecting consumers to figure this
out for themselves. That would go a long ways towards gaining better
customer satisfaction.
Agreed.
Russell.
begin:vcard
fn:Russell Smiley
n:Smiley;Russell
email;internet:im.russell.smiley@gmail.com
tel;home:+1 613 489 1472
tel;cell:+1 613 322 9433
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.linkedin.com/in/imrussellsmiley
version:2.1
end:vcard