NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
[ NNSquad ] re AT&T: FCC has never had regulatory power over broadband
----- Forwarded message from Dave Farber <dfarber@me.com> ----- Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:53:04 -0400 From: Dave Farber <dfarber@me.com> Subject: [IP] re AT&T: FCC has never had regulatory power over broadband Reply-To: dave@farber.net To: ip <ip@v2.listbox.com> Begin forwarded message: > From: George Ou <George.Ou@digitalsociety.org> > Date: April 14, 2010 1:36:52 PM EDT > To: "dave@farber.net" <dave@farber.net>, Lauren Weinstein <lauren@vortex.com>, "lsnewmanjr@yahoo.com" <lsnewmanjr@yahoo.com> > Cc: Richard Bennett <richard@bennett.com> > Subject: RE: [IP] AT&T: FCC has never had regulatory power over broadband > > The FCC had never had Title II powers over broadband on the IP layer (Layer 3). What they had was price regulation powers (Title II) over DSL transport (Layer 2) through the use of ATM PVCs in the DSLAM up until 2005. The FCC had regulated wholesale prices of the sharing of twisted pair and DSLAMs. > > > > In July 2005, the FCC won the “Brand X” case affirming its 2002 ruling that freed Cable Broadband from Title II. In August 2005, the FCC went further and freed DSL transport from Title II classification and no longer regulated wholesale prices for DSL transport. > > > > > > What the Open Internet Coalition and others are now is asking is that the FCC should regulate broadband on all levels under Title II such that its actions on Comcast and its NPRM can be justified. That would have to include layer 3 IP services, Internet transit, IP interconnect (peering), and maybe even CDN. But from what I am reading, the FCC is limited in power to regulate prices even on things like Video on Demand, so I can’t see how they would justify price regulating the whole darn Internet and everything it encompasses. I mean can the FCC regulate the price of Amazon’s virtual “Elastic Cloud” servicers? > > > > > > > > > > George Ou > > > > From: Dave Farber [mailto:dave@farber.net] > Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 5:56 AM > To: ip > Subject: [IP] AT&T: FCC has never had regulatory power over broadband > > > > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Stagg Newman <lsnewmanjr@yahoo.com> > Date: April 14, 2010 8:50:37 AM EDT > To: dave@farber.net, ip <ip@v2.listbox.com> > Subject: Re: [IP] AT&T: FCC has never had regulatory power over broadband > > The FCC has regulated Frame Relay, ATM, and SONET and other high speed private line services as Title II services. > > Those service are in the family of broadband services. > > > > The FCC did not regulate Internet service as Title II. > > > > There is a deft change in the email below from broadband to Internet. They are not synonymns. > > > > From: David Farber <dave@farber.net> > To: ip <ip@v2.listbox.com> > Sent: Tue, April 13, 2010 4:58:38 PM > Subject: [IP] AT&T: FCC has never had regulatory power over broadband > > > > Begin forwarded message: > > From: dewayne@warpspeed.com (Dewayne Hendricks) > Date: April 12, 2010 2:44:14 PM EDT > To: Dewayne-Net Technology List <xyzzy@warpspeed.com> > Subject: [Dewayne-Net] AT&T: FCC has never had regulatory power over broadband > > AT&T: FCC has never had regulatory power over broadband > The Hill > By Kim Hart > > AT&T lobbyist Hank Hultquist disputes that the FCC ever had the authority over broadband that it seeks today. > > His comments in a blog post fuel the fast-growing fight over whether the FCC can or should reclassify broadband as a "Title II" service, rather than the "Title I" service it is today. The D.C. Circuit clearly said last week that the FCC cannot impose net neutrality rules with the current classification. > > A host of legal experts and lobbyists have made the case that the FCC should be able to revert back to Title II, since the agency used to have regulatory authority over DSL and other broadband services until 2002, when they were reclassified as Title I. > > <http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/91603-atat-fcc-has-never-had-regulatory-power-over-broadband>RSS Feed: <http://www.warpspeed.com/wordpress> > > > > > ------------------------------------------- > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > > Archives > > > > ------------------------------------------- Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com ----- End forwarded message -----