NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad

NNSquad Home Page

NNSquad Mailing List Information

 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ NNSquad ] Re: DSLP AT&T CTO Wants Non-discrimination


----- Forwarded message from David Farber <dave@farber.net> -----

Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 17:37:06 -0500
From: David Farber <dave@farber.net>
Subject: [IP] WORTH READING   DSLP AT&T CTO Wants Non-discrimination
Reply-To: dave@farber.net
To: ip <ip@v2.listbox.com>

>From a requested anonymous friend:

"Never one to trust the second (third?) hand reports, I took a look at the 
video, available on the SuperComm website.  As is often the case, context 
matters.  This was a panel discussion of the CTOs of Verizon, Qwest, AT&T, 
Sprint etc. with a moderator asking questions.  After an hour or so of 
questions about growing demands on the network and what the CTOs were doing 
about it, the moderator said:  “I’m getting ready to change topics and 
climb out of the network and move up a little higher in the stack and talk 
a little more about applications . . .  The industry in general is talking 
about software-oriented networks and the ability to combine Web 2.0, IMS, 
SOA . . . So, I’ll ask each of you to answer this very quickly – How does 
your company define what software-oriented network actually is?”  The 
response was a response to that question, not to anything about “dumb” or 
“smart” pipes, network management, quality of service, government 
regulation,  or anything else relevant to the current network neutrality 
debate.  Now, I’m no expert on “software-oriented network” (SON) or 
“software-oriented architecture” (SOA) principles, but I did a little 
Internet research and it seems to refer to (somewhat loosely defined)  
cooperation among/communications between various types of system  
applications used to deliver services, such as OSS (operating support  
systems) and BSS (billing support systems), not end user applications (in 
other words, creating more seamless communication/integration between the 
network/service provider and third parties to which it has (contractually) 
outsourced particular functionalities).  Moreover, SON/SOA also seems to 
contemplate more, not less, applications intelligence residing in the 
network to facilitate that coordination.  So, sorry, there is no net 
neutrality headline here.  (Seems like Mr. Burstein could have figured this 
out with a little due diligence.)"

and

 "note that I wrote down the quote as a I was
listening to the blip.tv video of the panel; if you want to verify that
I got it exactly right here's the link

http://www.nextgenweb.org/supercomm-2009

Go to the Oct. 21 sessions.  Time code of the question on SONs comes at
64:40 - John's comments begin around 69:50."



-------------------------------------------
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

----- End forwarded message -----