NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
[ NNSquad ] Re: Dave Farber Warns Against Net Neutrality (Washington Post)I
Dave,
vint
On Sep 26, 2009, at 4:42 PM, David Farber wrote:
Vint, believe you misinterpret what I said in writing and interviews. I have never said that regulation is not good. What I have said is that hazy and ambiguous terms that have been used on dangerous to innovation. Suppose you were about to build a new building and the regulations said it should be "reasonable", "open", "fair". An architect attempting to design such a building would face a very confused task. You may have the building mostly built and then find that your assumptions about what these terms mean were wrong. You may face lawsuits by your neighbors over what these terms mean as well as facing the need to sue the city etc.
The bane of many such regulations is that all it does is to slow down innovation and create jobs for lawyers.
I'd be happy to join a SMALL group which attempted to create a set of principles and a framework for regulation which avoided these pitfalls.
Dave
I have said often that leaving the future of the Internet to the Congress is even more dangerous. Witness the 96 act and what it did to the CLECs.
On Sep 26, 2009, at 7:51 AM, Vint Cerf wrote:
I think Dave's position, which is largely unchanged, is that regulation is never right. Plainly, I disagree here and believe that it is entirely possible to establish a fair framework in which it is not necessary for broadband service providers to do anything more than manage congestion and allocation of capacity in a fashion commensurate with the service level to which the users have subscribed.
vint
On Sep 25, 2009, at 10:43 PM, Lauren Weinstein an architect
Dave Farber Warns Against Net Neutrality (Washington Post)
http://bit.ly/uAC2i (Washington Post)
--Lauren-- NNSquad Moderator