NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
NNSquad Home Page
NNSquad Mailing List Information
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ NNSquad ] Re: Levin Lays Out Telecom Policy Roadmap
- To: Lauren Weinstein <lauren@vortex.com>, nnsquad@nnsquad.org
- Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: Levin Lays Out Telecom Policy Roadmap
- From: Brett Glass <nnsquad@brettglass.com>
- Date: Mon, 09 Mar 2009 20:16:02 -0600
"(There is a) consensus emerging that disputes about whether a
wireline network management tool is 'reasonable' (or is actually
blocking or degrading traffic) to be resolved on a case-by-case
basis," [Blair] Levin wrote in the note with analysts Rebecca
Arbogast and David Kaut.
This is, perhaps, the scariest thing that a small or competitive
Internet provider -- or someone who might be interested in
investing in one -- could possibly hear.
Without clear cut rules (or forbearance from regulation, which is
appropriate in this case because there is no actual problem to
address), no small provider can know whether it could -- without
warning -- be hauled before a tribunal at crippling, potentially
bankrupting cost and subjected to a "case by case" (i.e. arbitrary)
decision against it... for violating a "rule" that no one knew
existed. What's more, because there would be no notice of proposed
rulemaking (as is required of Federal regulatory agencies), no
public discussion, no expert review of the proposed rule, and no
prior publication, the provider which was being attacked in the
proceeding (because that is what it would, essentially, be) could
not have known that it was violating anything. Is this fair? How
could this even remotely be considered to be within the bounds of due process?
What's more, a large corporation, such as an ILEC, could easily
bear the costs of such a proceeding, and could use
cross-subsidization to survive an edict which made its Internet
service unprofitable. But a small, fragile competitor? Especially
one that was a "pure play" ISP and could not shift costs? Highly
unlikely. The mere bringing of an action would be the equivalent of
a death sentence.
If the FCC is to become a "star chamber," independent ISPs might as
well all fold their hands right now. What's more, consumers might
as well give up all hope of competition -- and rural areas which
the cable and telephone companies won't deign to cover might as
well give up all hope of receiving quality terrestrial broadband services.
--Brett Glass