NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
NNSquad Home Page
NNSquad Mailing List Information
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[ NNSquad ] Re: My own take... BitTorrent Inc. + Comcast = Love, Peace, Harmony
- To: Brett Glass <nnsquad@brettglass.com>
- Subject: [ NNSquad ] Re: My own take... BitTorrent Inc. + Comcast = Love, Peace, Harmony
- From: David Ulevitch <david@opendns.com>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:10:18 -0700
- Cc: nnsquad@nnsquad.org
Lauren -- If this is a tangent, apologies. Just don't approve it for
the list.
On Mar 27, 2008, at 6:25 PM, Brett Glass wrote:
Maybe you just don't feel you've gotten your pound of flesh from
all of those evil ISPs yet. Ego swelled beyond recognition by
having started a destructive witch hunt, you're hungry for more.
I might be in the minority in thinking this, but the days of
"unlimited" residential Internet on an oversubscribed line are
numbered. As someone who purchases 10's of 1000's of dollars of
commercial IP transit each month I would begrudgingly be in support
of one of two things happening:
1) ISPs sell me committed bandwidth. The downside to this is that
they are either dramatically increasing their pipes to match current
offerings or they are selling me something slower than I have today.
Some ISPs can fix this with a committed minimum with a substantially
higher "burst" ability that is available during times of no congestion.
2) ISPs charge me for the number of bits I send on the wire. This is
how commercial transit largely works. There are downsides to this
model for the consumer but it has lots of positive side effects most
notably probably being a big helper in stopping P2P-based piracy (or
at least seeding). On the plus side, hopefully my mom and dad would
pay less (like they do on their cell phone) and I'd pay more (since
I'm a hungry Internet user).
If I had to pick, I'd rather #2 than #1.
-David
[ But in a #2 scenario, what's to stop the customer from ending
up paying "per bit" but still having servers prohibited, being
throttled, being port blocked, etc.? And obviously if the
ISP/TV service isn't also charging you per bit for their own
content offerings, everyone except the ISP itself will be at an
enormous competitive disadvantage in terms of such content.
And somehow I suspect that ISPs will fight tooth and nail against
having their own content treated the same way as outside content.
-- Lauren Weinstein
NNSquad Moderator ]