NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad

NNSquad Home Page

NNSquad Mailing List Information

 


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[ NNSquad ] ISPs and the "Secret Service"


Greetings.  I'm not sending to the list several messages that
threatened to spin us off into Neverland again, despite an amusing
anecdote from Brett Glass, where he speculates that he was apparently
being mischaracterized as a likely P2P user (!) which caused his
attempts to do a large download of GPS software via RoadRunner to
fail repeatedly.  He ended up having to go to a cybercafe, and since
their router was having problems he updated its firmware and finally
got his download.  A happy ending.

Apropos, this might be a good time to note again a key reason why I
instigated this project in the first place.  In many ways, most
consumer and low-end business Internet access packages are something
of "secret services" from the standpoint of individual customers.  
To an extent that is really quite remarkable, people really don't know
what they're getting for their money, and most ISPs seem perfectly
happy to let their subscribers assume that any observed service
oddities are due to problems in subscribers' hardware or software,
not related to how the ISP network is provisioned.

Note that Internet access services at this level are sold almost
entirely based on theoretical speed claims, with usually nary a
mention of traffic shaping, throttling, blocking, jitter, warping,
morphing, or other "active" ISP data management procedures that
really can have dramatic impacts on end-user applications
performance.

The specific decisions of how these various actions will be applied
to customer circuits are generally made by (from the customer point
of view) faceless entities deep in giant corporations (yes, Brett, I
know *you* are not a faceless entity in a giant corporation, but
you're the exception).  Typically, only the most general description
of such activities will be buried in the Terms of Service, and ISPs
often consider the details to be proprietary.  Subscribers pay
anyway, because (1) they don't really know what's going on in these
respects and (2) they don't have much choice anyway.

In Brett's case, was the behavior he saw the result of purposeful
decisions by RoadRunner, or was a misconfiguration or other technical
problem to blame?  Hard to really know for sure, and trying to dig
out info like that could easily become a long-term hobby for the
average consumer.

We can argue forever (but not on the list!) about which (if any) of
these data "management" procedures are appropriate and reasonable.
But my take is that keeping them secret is not acceptable.  Customers
deserve to know exactly what they're paying for.  This project hopes
to help provide them, and policymakers, with that information.

--Lauren--
NNSquad Moderator