NNSquad - Network Neutrality Squad
[ NNSquad ] Re: tools
These are my results but they very much underestimate the performance
I do get. Notice the tests date form 2002. Here is my result from Argonne (from my FiOS connection in
Newton, Ma) TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic
Tool v5.3.4e click START to begin Another client is currently
being served, your test will begin within 45 seconds Checking for Middleboxes . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test
(client to server) . . . . . 1.28Mb/s running 10s inbound test
(server to client) . . . . . . 6.88Mb/s The slowest link in the
end-to-end path is a 10 Mbps Ethernet subnet Information: Other network
traffic is congesting the link And from Rochester TCP/Web100 Network Diagnostic
Tool v5.4.12 click START to begin Connected to:
web100.rit.edu -- Using IPv4 address Checking for Middleboxes . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done checking for firewalls . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Done running 10s outbound test
(client-to-server [C2S]) . . . . . 2.49Mb/s running 10s inbound test
(server-to-client [S2C]) . . . . . . 44.65Mb/s Server unable to determine
bottleneck link type. Information: Other network
traffic is congesting the link [S2C]: Packet queuing
detected Does anyone know Rich Carlson? What would it take to update these
meters and run them on client systems? There are a number of other statistics
under “more details” that would be nice to capture as XML. Even
better if the client side were scripted to test at regular intervals to help
compensate for congestion. From:
nnsquad-bounces+bob19-0501=bobf.frankston.com@nnsquad.org
[mailto:nnsquad-bounces+bob19-0501=bobf.frankston.com@nnsquad.org] On Behalf
Of Bob Weber All -------------------- |